Protecting endangered species that offer poachers from low-income countries high economic benefits remains a policy challenge. A broadly applicable economic model of poaching shows why CITES international bans have not always been successful, especially in situations where black markets exist and nonpoaching wages are low. In these situations, poachers may have nothing left to lose, since low nonpoaching wages impose a practical cap on the potential economic costs of fines and imprisonment. Thus, the model suggests “shoot-on-sight” policies as the only viable option. Trends in animal populations appear to support the efficacy of the shoot-on-sight policies, which also suggests an inherent value of life traditionally not captured in Value of a Statistical Life estimates
An introduction to systems dynamics applied to the management of rangelands
Friday, October 1, 2010
Protecting endangered species: When are shoot-on-sight policies the only viable option to stop poaching?
ScienceDirect - Ecological Economics : Protecting endangered species: When are shoot-on-sight policies the only viable option to stop poaching?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment